Another round of
Afghanistan peace efforts
US Special Envoy
for Afghan reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad has held talks with Foreign Minister
Shah Mahmood Qureshi and delegation-level talks with Foreign Secretary Tehmina
Janjua on December 4, 2018 during his third visit to Pakistan since taking
charge of his office in September this year. Khalilzad had accompanied US Secretary
of State Mike Pompeo to Islamabad just a day after his appointment and then
returned in October. This visit is part of an extensive itinerary that will
take the Special Envoy after Pakistan to Afghanistan, Russia, Uzbekistan, the
UAE and Qatar in a stepped up effort to find a peaceful solution to the war in
Afghanistan. In Islamabad the Special Envoy received assurances of support from
our foreign minister for a political settlement in Afghanistan. Although this
statement and our Foreign Office’s take on Khalilzad’s visit on the surface
appeared positive, reports said the talks were inconclusive. This should not
come as a surprise since the issue of finding a solution to the Afghan
conundrum, complicated as it already is, was rendered even more difficult by US
President Donald Trump’s recent criticism of Pakistan’s role in the affair. The
interview in which Trump castigated Pakistan was followed by a brief twitter
war between him and Prime Minister Imran Khan. On the eve of Khalilzad’s visit
though, the US President wrote our prime minister a letter seeking Pakistan’s
cooperation and acknowledging that both the US and Pakistan had suffered
because of the conflict. This was seen as an attempt to smooth out the wrinkles
in the relationship produced by the Trump-Khan exchange and pave the way for
Zalmay Khalilzad to be received more warmly. Before departing on his extended
tour, Khalilzad said in an interview that he had reassured Pakistan’s leaders
that the US was not seeking a political settlement hostile to them. This could
be interpreted as an attempt to allay Pakistan’s oft repeated concerns
regarding India’s growing role in Afghanistan.
Special Envoy
Zalmay Khalilzad’s shuttle through the region and further abroad to speak to
regional and international stakeholders in the Afghan conundrum, including a
meeting with the Afghan Taliban’s Doha office, comes amidst a growing consensus
worldwide that no military solution is possible and only a political settlement
can cause the guns to fall silent. Iran, despite being at loggerheads with the
Trump administration on its nuclear programme, agrees with this formulation in
tandem with Pakistan. While the US-Pakistan relationship is bedevilled by Washington’s
blow hot, blow cold perambulations, the war inside Afghanistan is intensifying,
with the Taliban gaining ground and inflicting an enhanced attrition rate of
casualties on the Afghan government forces that the US military by now considers
unsustainable. The Taliban have simultaneously been following a classic
strategy of talking to the US fitfully while fighting, at the same time
sticking to their position of no talks with the Kabul government that they
regard as a US puppet. Afghan President Ashraf Ghani’s half-in, half-out stance
vis-à-vis the current peace efforts reflects concerns that his government may
be bypassed. He may have been encouraged by the just concluded UN conference in
Geneva that recommended direct talks between the Ashraf Ghani government and
the Taliban. Meanwhile the foreign media reports say Afghan Taliban chief
Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada has called a Doha office delegation to Pakistan
for consultations simultaneously while Khalilzad was here. Whether this signals
a response to the latter’s expressed desire that the Taliban mandate their
representatives to take decisions after talks with him or not is unclear.
Logically, the endgame in Afghanistan points in the direction of a political settlement
that offers the Taliban a share in power without being in a position to overthrow
the Kabul government. But to get there, all the parties directly engaged in the
conflict, the US, the Kabul government and the Taliban will sooner or later
have to open channels of dialogue with each other to grope their way towards
reconciliation.
No comments:
Post a Comment