Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Business Recorder Column February 17, 2026

US global hegemony drive in full swing

 

Rashed Rahman

 

In its latest effort to annex the West Bank captured by it in 1967 and occupied since, Israel has now claimed West Bank land as ‘state property’. This would register large parts of the Palestinian area as Israeli state land. Although this is a blatant violation of the international law that states an occupying power cannot confiscate land in occupied territories, the real purpose of this measure is to provide state security to the myriads of Israeli settlers who have been nibbling away at the territory for years. Palestinian protests against such actions have failed to budge the Zionists, underlining the helplessness of the by now discredited Palestinian Authority which, for all intents and purposes has been functioning as a collaborator with the Israeli state in the West Bank and otherwise. Although it is largely confined to Gaza, Hamas has nevertheless voiced its indignation at this blatant exercise in settler colonialism, now reinforced more than ever by the Israeli state.

Those of us entrapped in following Israel’s cruelties in Gaza since 2003 would do well to remember some history. Around the time East European socialism and the Soviet state began to unravel (1989-1991), US imperialism felt emboldened to pursue its long held ambition to emerge as the global hegemon. Since the Soviet state was no longer around to act as a brake on this ambition, Washington went pell mell down this path it had cherished during the Cold War and which it now found feasible to pursue without fear of any other power able to restrict its appalling plan.

A few examples of US military power being unleashed globally may serve to refresh our memories. Iraq, Libya and Syria were the three holdout Arab states when Egypt, and following in its footsteps Jordan and other Arab states folded in the face of Israeli aggression (supported by the US) and plumped instead for recognition of Israel and a shameful peace with the Zionist aggressor. One by one, all three regimes in these holdout Arab states were demolished. First came Iraq, which had foolishly under Saddam Hussein interpreted US seeming neutrality in its territorial and oil reserves dispute with neighbour Kuwait and embarked on an invasion and occupation of the latter, a move that invited two invasions by the US (ironically, when father and son Bush were US Presidents), overthrowing and eventually hanging Saddam. Libya came next when Muammar Gaddafi’s regime was overthrown, helped by US air bombardment. Gaddafi was subsequently killed in horrific fashion by his newly installed enemies. Those same enemies recently reached out and assassinated Gaddafi’s son, living peacefully in Libya for years. Last but not least, the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad was overthrown last year, with Assad and his family luckily making their escape to asylum in Moscow. However, having knocked out the three Arab holdout regimes was not enough for the US’s purposes. It now turned its attention to Iran and resistance groups in Lebanon (Hezbollah) and Yemen (the Houthis) with Israel playing the frontline role. Hezbollah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah was killed in the process and Hezbollah weakened, while the Houthis were quelled considerably.

Along comes Trump, and the theatre expands to Latin America. Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro and his wife are kidnapped by the US military and transported to the US to face trumped up charges in a US federal court. Perforce, Maduro’s Vice President Delcy Rodriguez has had to ‘cooperate’ with US demands to stave off further military adventures by Trump. In the process, US multinational oil corporations evicted from Venezuela when its oil industry was largely nationalised, are once again returning to the extraction of oil and profit game in Venezuela. Trump has cut off oil supplies to Cuba, whose people, already struggling under punitive sanctions by the US, are now switching to electric vehicles and cycle rickshaws in the absence of fuel. Trump hopes this added sanctions pressure on Cuba may help him find the Cuban Delcy Rodriguez who would help the US dismantle the socialist regime in that country.

Of concern to thinking Pakistanis is our return to currying favour with our on-again, off-again ‘friend’, the US, by flattering the infamous ego of Trump and, most alarming, hitching our wagon to his so-called Board of Peace intended (under Trumpian tutelage) to ‘sort out’ the Gaza conflict. Theoretically a ceasefire exists between the Palestinians and Israel in Gaza, but this has not stopped Israel continuing to kill Palestinians on a daily basis on the pretext it is striking Hamas, while pulverising the Gaza Palestinians by constant displacement and cutting off food, supplies and medical care to the besieged suffering denizens of Gaza. If Hamas continues to resist the Board of Peace plan’s insistence it must surrender its weapons, the International Security Force envisaged to implement this demand, and which Pakistan has yet to commit to, may be drawn into conflict with Hamas. If Pakistani troops are part of this International Security Force, it may be forced into another shameful conflict with our Palestinian brothers, an eventuality that would revive the horrific memories of our role on the side of the Jordanian monarchy against the Palestinians in 1970. Tempting in terms of benefits our being part of the Board of Peace may seem superficially, but it threatens once again to pitch us on the wrong side of history via-a-vis the Palestinians.

Time for a sober review of our race to get into the good books of Trump. Our embarrassment because of this link with the US may not end here. If the above brief recapitulation of post-Cold War US actions and the ambitions they expose is kept in mind, more embarrassment and discomfort may ensue if we insist on being dragged along while holding onto the tiger’s tail of US (by now) unrestricted plans to secure global hegemony, leaving even its longtime Western allies in the lurch.

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Business Recorder Column February 10, 2026

Insurgency, terrorism, literature and kites

 

Rashed Rahman

 

The last week or so has been a very ‘busy’ one. On January 31, 2026, an unprecedented coordinated series of attacks in Balochistan rocked the country. Pakistan had barely got over that shock when an anti-Shia sectarian bomb blast in a mosque in Islamabad once again sent the country reeling. While this mayhem was afoot, Pakistan, particularly Lahore, witnessed Literary Festivals, the annual Asma Jahangir Conference and a revived Basant. Balochistan’s troubles are hardly new. The nationalist insurgency has been part of our news cycle since 2002. However, this time the extent and nature of the attacks suggested that the insurgent group Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) is by now better organised and enjoys enhanced capability. The Islamabad bomb blast was claimed by the Islamic State (IS), in a reminder that while we concentrate our counterterrorism efforts against the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), there still exist other fundamentalist terrorist groups like the IS, whose bloody signature was all over the Islamabad bomb blast.

Call it escape or relief, Lahore in particular, but also Karachi, were entertained to another annual feature: Literary Festivals. Timed to coincide with Lahore’s revived Basant, the sum total of all this activity could be taken as relief from our continuing woes. Whether it also enhanced our grasp of what the country faces, and accompanying it the virtual collapse of our intelligentsia, is a matter for deep introspection. Terrorism is the fallout of our decades-old engagement in Afghanistan, with the final result of all these efforts and sacrifices less than satisfactory, to put it mildly.

Balochistan found a questioning audience at the Asma Jahangir Conference, particularly in response to Akhtar Mengal’s hard-hitting speech, in which he castigated the powers that be with failure to engage with the peaceful nationalist camp for a way out of the morass the province seems trapped in. As part of his exposition on the missing persons issue, he referred to the assassination of his brother, Asad Mengal in the 1970s struggle in Balochistan, when Asad and his companion Ahmed Shah Kurd were killed in Karachi, their bodies disappeared, leaving only their blood stained car as a tragic reminder. Akhtar Mengal’s argument was that his family was never contacted regarding Asad Mengal’s disappearance. He said the same playbook of enforced disappearances still sears the soul of his province’s people, arguing for a political solution through negotiations with the peaceful nationalist forces. It remains to be seen however, whether his pleas again fall on deaf ears, particularly since now the state’s narrative describes both the Baloch insurgents and TTP, etc, as India-backed terrorists. With this maximalist description dominant, Akhtar Mengal’s voice promises to once again be lost in a sea of tragic longing, without change.

Pakistan has a penchant for latching on to what seems like a good promotional idea. After Ameena Syed, when she was still heading Oxford University Press in Pakistan, established the Karachi Literary Festival as a go-to annual get together, Literary Festivals have bloomed all over the country like spring flowers. The Lahore Literary Festival was the first to follow, and by now, big cities and little, all seem to savour their own annual literary festivals. While I would be the last one to decry such activity in an otherwise increasingly barren intellectual and cultural milieu that has overtaken us, one may be forgiven for questioning the quality of the fare now available in these literary festivals. The vacuum inside is sought to be filled with contributions from guest participants from abroad, with local talent, struggling as it is, demoted to a secondary status. Are we then truly rid of our colonial hangovers or is this merely wishful thinking?

Lahore’s sorely missed Basant festival returned after an absence of 19 years, rendering the younger generation enthusiastic newcomers to the city’s once famed festival heralding the arrival of spring. Lahoris, and their many keen compatriots from all over the country, gathered to fly kites, play music and enjoy the city’s delicious cuisine, with strict SOPs largely followed that prevented the fatal accidents of yore (largely kite strings cutting motorcyclists’ throats). The Punjab government of Maryam Nawaz deserves our commendation for restoring the Basant spirit to a deprived Lahore. But the revival also makes one wonder whether the original ban made any sense. The critical problem was string being manufactured that was fatal when it met human flesh. If such string could be prevented from being manufactured now, and sparing Lahoris those tragedies of yesteryear, why could this not have been done 19 years ago instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater by banning the festival entire? One can only call this our penchant for doing things without even a smidgin of thought, and then moaning our loss…till now. May the spirit of Lahore Lahore Ai (Lahore is Lahore) once again march forward with the best the city has to offer to an otherwise troubled realm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Monday, February 9, 2026

Filmbar's screening of Michael Haneke's "The Piano Teacher" (2001) at Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, February 13, 2026 at 5:00 pm

Filmbar's screening of Michael Haneke's "The Piano Teacher" (2001) at Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, February 13, 2026 at 5:00 pm.
Erika Kohut is a pianist, teaching music. Schubert and Schumann are her forte, but she's not quite at concert level. She's approaching middle age, living with her mother who is more domineering than submissive; Erika is a victim but combative. With her students she is severe. Walter is a self-assured student with some musical talent; he auditions for her class and is forthright in his attraction to her. She responds coldly then demands he let her lead. Next she changes the game with a letter, inviting him into her fantasies.

Address: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom). Lift is operational.

The screening will be followed by an informal discussion over tea.

Rashed Rahman
Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)
Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)


Tuesday, February 3, 2026

The February 2026 issue of Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) is out

The February 2026 issue of Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) is out. Link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com

Contents:

1. Rashed Rahman: Marx and the Asiatic Mode of Production – IV: The impact of Colonialism.
2. Vijay Prashad: How many International Laws can the US break against Venezuela and still get away with it?
3. Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur: Obituary: Mama Qadeer.
4. Jagdeesh Ahuja: Bhutto, Yahya and Tikka Khan: One Civilian, Two Army Men.
5. Ray Nunes: From Marx to Mao – And After – VI: Why a Cultural Revolution?
6. From the PMR Archives: December 2019: Rashed Rahman: Is China still a revolutionary socialist country -I & January 2020 – II.

Rashed Rahman
Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)
Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)


Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Filmbar's screening of Park Chan-wook's "No Other Choice" (2025) at Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, January 30, 2026 at 5:00 pm

Filmbar's screening of Park Chan-wook's No Other Choice (2025) at Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, January 30, 2026 at 5:00 pm.
It is a dark satirical thriller following Man-su (Lee Byung-hun), a 25-year veteran paper industry worker laid off after an American takeover. Desperate to maintain his family's upper-middle-class lifestyle and support his cello-prodigy daughter, he embarks on a murderous rampage to eliminate top candidates for potential jobs. 
Address: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom). Lift is operational. The screening will be followed by an informal discussion over tea.

Rashed Rahman

Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)

Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)

Email: rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

Cells: 0302 8482737 & 0333 4216335

Monday, January 19, 2026

Mujahid Eshai's Talk on "Why Translate?" at Research and Publication Centre (RPC) ) on Thursday, January 22, 2026 at 5:00 pm

Research and Publication Centre (RPC)


CORDIALLY INVITES YOU TO

                                               

                                                                                                      A TALK ON "WHY TRANSLATE? THE ART OF TRANSLATION"  

     

      BY MR. MUJAHID ESHAI, AN AUTHOR OF 21 PUBLISHED TRANSLATIONS.

 

                  MR. ESHAI WILL SHARE HIS THOUGHTS ON THE SUBJECT AND PROBLEMS

 

                  THAT ARISE IN THE COURSE OF TRANSLATING.

 

                              WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR PARTICIPATION

VENUE: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign Showroom                                                                                                      TIME: 5:00 P.M.

 

                                                                                                                                DATE: JANUARY 22, 2026


Rashed Rahman

Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com

Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)

Email: rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

Cells: 0302 8482737 (WhatsApp) & 0333 4216335

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Business Recorder Column Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Might is right

 

Rashed Rahman

 

The world owes a vote of thanks to US President Donald Trump. If this sounds surprising given what Trump has been up to of late, bear with me. Not only has Trump abducted Venezuela’s elected President Maduro and his wife, he has threatened Cuba, Colombia, Mexico, Greenland and Iran with US imperialist intervention. The reason he needs to be thanked is that through his actions and daily bullying statements, he has stripped the veil from the smokescreen of ‘democracy’ ‘human rights’, etc., which Washington usually trots out to justify its interventionist adventures. But being Trump, he has not stopped there. He has had the audacity to proclaim that his power is restrained only by “my own morality” and “my mind”. These recent actions and words amount to nothing less than unrestrained bullying.

Trump has even trotted out his version of the Monroe Doctrine, enunciated by US President James Monroe in 1863, to keep former European colonial powers out of the Americas, in what may well be the prelude to a new chapter in the history of this infamous doctrine. The US has intervened in Latin America to bring about regime change and safeguard or promote its interests over 40 times in the last century and a half. Now, having captured Maduro, Trump blatantly declares the US will ‘run’ Venezuela, including extracting oil and keeping the revenues from it in Washington’s ‘safekeeping’. However, despite the fact that Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world, the US and other multinational oil companies Trump invited for a meeting in Washington to discuss how this project would be handled expressed their deep reservations regarding the billions of dollars investment required for the task. Trump’s enthusiasm for usurping Venezuelan oil, therefore, may not be as easy as he thinks.

Venezuela and other countries on Trump’s interventionist radar seem to be responding in mild tones, presumably to prevent a military response from Trump’s overblown hegemonic ambitions. If Latin America is troubled by this possibility, Europe is aghast at Trump’s declarations of taking over Greenland without so much as a nod towards its people’s wishes. Denmark has warned any such move would mean the end of NATO. Europe is currently wrestling with the implications of being ‘dumped’ by Trump, whether in the case of Ukraine or dismantling the Western alliance without even a heart’s flutter. Iran’s current difficulties in facing a mass protest movement by its people can of course be traced to US sanctions, which have made the Iranian people’s lives unlivable economically. But there could be a grain of truth in the Iranian regime’s accusation that the US and Israel have a hand in the current agitation (a la the Colour Revolutions post-Soviet collapse). However, Trump’s bluff about military intervention in Iran will surely provoke resistance and blowback from Tehran, as stated by the Iranian regime.

As if all this was not enough, Trump has delineated his ‘philosophy’ in an interview to The New York Times, in which he says international laws, treaties and institutions apply only when he decides they do. Checks on power, considered necessary by modern political thought, are optional as far as Trump is concerned. In other words if international law serves US interests, it applies. If not, it can be ignored, redefined, brushed aside. Rivals, of course, are not allowed to use the same logic. Even the US Congress and internal laws must toe Trump’s line or be overridden. The danger is that the US will, as it always has, act forcefully but will stop explaining why force should have any limitations at all placed upon it. Trump therefore sees himself as King-Emperor of the world and has donned new clothes to prove it. While the world reels from the uncertainty and instability unleashed by Trump, some may wonder whether the Emperor’s new clothes actually exist or not.

Pakistanis should be able quite easily to discern the lessons to be learnt from this Trumpian display of bullying and arrogance, based on their own history. That history shows that when power claims to stand unfettered above the law in the name of stability, security or national interest, used by military and ‘hybrid’ regimes as justifications for their hold on power and policies, the result has been the weakening of institutions, blurred or missing accountability, and questions about legitimate authority. Trump could do worse than look at these lessons and desist from parading his ego on the world stage beyond belief. If not, as the debate in the UN Security Council on the Venezuela situation elaborated through widespread condemnations, the world has swing back to an era of lawlessness. But the US may well have bitten off more than it can chew, whether in the uncertainties surrounding its ‘takeover’ of Venezuela, its repeated threats against other countries, or the long term adverse implications for the US itself.

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com