Media under
attack
On July 9, 2019,
the federal cabinet ‘decided’ under trial prisoners or convicted felons would
not be allowed to give interviews on television. Announcing this to the media
after the cabinet meeting, Federal Education Minister Shafqat Mahmood trotted
out arguments to assert that this was not allowed in any democracy. The reference
at that point was to the interview of Asif Zardari that was pulled off the air
soon after it started. If proof was required that the government meant what it
said, this was provided by Maryam Nawaz’s interview also being pulled off the
air soon after it started. This indicated what the government meant by under
trial prisoners and convicted felons, i.e. the leaders of the two main
opposition parties. Although Maryam Nawaz posted the two additional videos of
Accountability Court Judge Arshad Malik on her twitter account after her interview
was pulled, the developments add to the existing concerns about censorship of
the media that seems to be incrementally increasing since the Pakistan
Tehreek-i-Insaaf (PTI) government came to office. As it is, reports are rife
about the authorities leaning on critical coverage and comment in both the
electronic and print media. There is plenty to be critical of the PTI
government’s performance in office so far, particularly on its handling of the
economy that has produced protests by the traders and complaints of massive inflation
from the people. For governments claiming to have come to power through the
ballot box, it behoves them to take criticism on the media or generally in
their stride as part of the democratic process and not see ‘conspiracies’ under
every bed. Instead, three TV channels were taken off the air for showing Maryam
Nawaz’s first press conference allegedly exposing Judge Arshad Malik’s purported
shenanigans. Although the channels were subsequently restored, the issue found
an echo with international media watchdogs the Committee to Protect Journalists
(CPJ) and Reporters sans Frontieres (RSF), both of whom condemned the ‘climate
of censorship and fear’ that had overtaken the media landscape in Pakistan in
recent days. The issue also affected Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi’s
interaction with media in London where he was attending a conference. The media
boycotted his press conference and video footage showed row upon row of empty
seats at the venue. As if all this were not enough, social media lately carried
an online drive targeting independent journalists in Pakistan under the hash
tag #ArrestAntiPakjournalists.
The regime of
mainstream media strangulation and social media monitoring and interventions
seems now firmly entrenched. The government keeps promising to clear the huge
dues it owes to the media, which is partly responsible for thousands of
journalists losing their jobs. The unpromising advertising scene these days is
another factor that has persuaded the media to exercise self-censorship, apart
from the heavy ‘leaning’ on independent and critical media houses and
journalists. This atmosphere of intimidation and financial privation does no
good to the cause of a free media, which is a sine qua non of any democratic
dispensation. But arguably it does no good to the incumbent government either,
since continued repression of dissident and critical voices that may not
totally succeed in today’s world can only lead those in power down the slippery
slope of more and more repression. Should this come to pass because of the
government’s thin-skinned response to criticism, it bodes ill for democracy, a
free media, and even the authors of the repressive regime themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment