Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Business Recorder Editorial September 25, 2018

Proceed with caution

Prime Minister (PM) Imran Khan’s remarks in Karachi the other day regarding giving citizenship to children of refugees and illegal immigrants who were born here has set off the expected mini-storm. In the National Assembly on September 18, 2018, the PM had to justify his remarks after Balochistan National Party-Mengal (BNP-M) leader Sardar Akhtar Mengal sought an explanation for the PM’s statement. Akhtar Mengal argued that any such step would violate the agreement between his party and the PTI as part of their alliance after the elections. Imran Khan clarified that no decision in this regard had been taken yet and he would welcome input from all stakeholders on the issue. However, the PM went on to say that Karachi’s growing street crime is linked with the underclass composed of the children of Bengalis and Afghan refugees who cannot get CNICs or passports and therefore are unemployable. This deprived class, he argued, is driven to crime as it has no other option. While acknowledging Akhtar Mengal’s objection that the PTI and BNP-M had an agreement that the Afghan refugees would be sent back, the PM said this was a humanitarian issue. The examples the PM gave of western countries included the US, where despite President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration, including separating children from their parents, the practice endures. However, in the UK it is no longer an automatic right for children born there. Europe is struggling with its own take on the issue, exacerbated currently by the refugee crisis. Pakistan’s 1951 citizenship law does allow children born here to acquire Pakistani nationality. But this is not simply a legal or humanitarian issue. As Sindh Chief Minister (CM) Murad Ali Shah dilated during a press conference in Karachi after the PM’s visit, the PM’s idea could not be implemented if it was not in conformity with the Pakistan Citizenship Act 1951. Were this to be carried out it would open the floodgates of illegal immigration into Pakistan, he stressed. The Chief Minister Balochistan, Jam Kamal Khan, also questioned the grounds on which the PM had given such a statement. No doubt Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) leaders, despite a PTI government being in power in the province, would express similar sentiments given their own experience of hosting millions of Afghan refugees for decades.
PM Imran Khan may genuinely feel pangs of conscience regarding the non-status of children of refugees and illegal immigrants born on our soil. His concern that such youngsters feed the burgeoning street crime phenomenon may not be far off the mark, although the assertion that a majority of such crimes are carried out by these youngsters is questionable on the touchstone of local, indigenous youngsters too perhaps being involved in such activities, given widespread unemployment. It could also be that PM Imran Khan said what he thought his Karachi audience wanted to hear. But as CM Murad Ali Shah quipped, such utterings may be a hangover of Imran Khan and the PTI’s agitation mode while in opposition, whereas they now needed to dispense with that culture and soberly take on the tasks of governance.

KP and Balochistan have long complained of the heavy presence of Afghan refugees for decades in their respective provinces. KP felt this overwhelming presence disadvantaged the indigenous citizens and their rights to economic and other opportunities. Balochistan feared its delicate demography would be irrevocably altered to the deprivation in one more way of its long-suffering people. Sindh rightfully sees Karachi as the jewel in its crown and has been averse to changing the de jure polyglot demography of its populace by according citizenship to illegal immigrants (mostly from Bangladesh) or Afghan refugees. These are old and sensitive issues for all three provinces. The PM is therefore advised to tread softly, softly on such terrain, and certainly not without listening to the full range of views on the problem from all stakeholders before even discussing the issue publicly. As Akhtar Mengal put it, when the PM speaks, it is taken as the state’s policy. Imran Khan has to learn the limits circumscribing the PM’s ability to speak casually on issues of such sensitivity.

No comments:

Post a Comment