Thursday, August 2, 2018

Business Recorder Editorial Aug 2, 2018

Grand opposition alliance

Politics often makes strange bedfellows. Whichever way you look at it, the 2018 elections have proved one of the most controversial in our history. Amidst almost the entire panoply of parties except the PTI, there are resounding cries of rigging, pre-poll and post-poll onwards. The results show PTI in power in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa by a handsome margin, an ‘upset’ given the trajectory of the province in recent years of voting out incumbent governments after one term. PTI appears also poised to form the governments at the Centre and Punjab with the help of some smaller parties and the ubiquitous independents, and in alliance with, if not part of, the coalition government likely to be led by the recently formed Balochistan Awami Party (BAP) in Balochistan. So while Imran Khan and the PTI appear to be master of, if not all, at least a large part of what they survey, these facts on the ground are not without challenge. A grand opposition alliance appears to be taking shape to enter parliament and give the PTI a tough time inside the Assemblies and outside. Four parties met in Islamabad on July 30 and agreed to forge such an alliance. They include the PML-N, PPP, MMA and ANP. After talks with Hasil Bizenjo, the National Party (NP) also has agreed to join the new grouping. To get to this point required a fair bit of public and private dialogue. The most difficult to persuade seems to have been Maulana Fazlur Rehman of JUI-F of MMA, who appears quite miffed and angry at having lost in his home constituency in D I Khan. His suggestion to boycott parliament and take to the streets in protest against the ‘stolen’ election and the efforts to bring the PTI to power in the Centre and Punjab had few takers amongst the other parties. On the contrary, they seem to have almost persuaded Maulana Fazlur Rehman to eschew any ideas of agitation and instead use parliament to wage their struggle. The alliance being born intends to approach some parties in Balochistan to widen their base. They also intend to hold another All Parties Conference after the one Maulana Fazlur Rehman called the other day failed to persuade the PPP and some smaller parties to attend, although Shahbaz Sharif represented the PML-N there. This second All Parties Conference is expected to issue a ‘White Paper’ detailing the alleged rigging before and after the voting had ended. The opposition parties have condemned such alleged rigging, including curbs on the media and freedom of expression on the social media. Pressures exerted on PML-N candidates to defect (some did) and other sleight of hand before and after the polling also skewed the election results in favour of one party, the PTI, it is alleged.

In the muddied waters post-polling, this grand opposition alliance-in-the-making has asserted that this election has exposed the establishment like never before. The demand for investigating these alleged ‘irregularities’ and worse through a judicial commission followed the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP’s) relatively unsympathetic response to the charges of mismanagement. The ECP went so far as to reject the demands for the Chief Election Commissioner and the whole ECP to step down. The opposition alternatively envisages a parliamentary commission to probe the election. It is too early to say whether any of these demands will be fulfilled, since the business of garnering the necessary votes at the Centre and in Punjab has everyone’s attention. Even if the opposition’s demands for an independent investigation are not acceded to, they have wisely kept their powder dry to first exhaust the redressal procedure allowed by appeal to the ECP, election tribunals and then the courts. Meanwhile, they intend to make life difficult for the PTI-led governments at the Centre and in the provinces. This caution is both pragmatic and wise, not the least because of the precarious economic and security situation confronting the country. The opposition has shown considerable maturity and adherence to lawful and democratic means to strive for their objectives. Whatever the outcome, parliament and the democratic system stand to gain. It is therefore all the more welcome.

No comments:

Post a Comment