Tuesday, December 31, 2024

Business Recorder column December 31, 2024

Happy New Year?

 

Rashed Rahman

 

This, they say traditionally, is the turn-of-the-year season to be jolly. But even a cursory glance at the afflictions that ail Pakistan will lead inevitably and logically to the conclusion that there is precious little to be happy about. While the never-ending saga of the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf (PTI) versus the government swamps the media, there are perhaps deeper issues that are even more troubling. Let us survey some of these briefly.

Terrorism has us in its grip once again, particularly in the western border provinces. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) is exhibiting a resurgence perhaps beyond even what it could manage in the past. Not only are attacks being carried out on an enhanced scale (mostly on the security forces this time round), they are deadlier in their effect. Now even cross-border infiltration and attacks are the order of the day, with reportedly Afghan Taliban help. This latter is the new factor that has upset the applecart. After the Afghan Taliban came to power in 2021 in the wake of the ignominious US retreat, not only are the TTP’s safe havens on Afghan soil even more secure, the new Afghan rulers appear to have opened for the TTP the doors to their warehouses stocking tons of abandoned US weapons. Hence the increased deadliness of the TTP attacks. Pakistan is now paying for the ill-conceived support for the fanatical Afghan Taliban in the illusory hope that theirs would be a friendly regime when in power. The Afghan Taliban on the other hand, have cocked a snook at their erstwhile ‘friend’ Pakistan and plumped instead for support to their ideological brothers, the TTP. Imran Khan was in power in 2021, and invited the TTP back. Faiz Hameed is supposed to have managed the whole gambit. Now that this generosity towards the fanatics has turned sour, the PTI is desperately trying to shift the blame onto General Bajwa. It is doubtful if many will swallow this ‘u-turn’ without demur. Clearly, the dye is now cast in favour of a determined campaign of eliminating the TTP once and for all.

While the military establishment appears to have succeeded in browbeating the mainstream media into eliminating the distinction between the religious fundamentalist terrorist extremism of the TTP and the nationalist insurgency in Balochistan, both having by now been lumped indiscriminately into the ‘terrorist’ basket, the blurring of the difference has not helped. The Balochistan nationalist insurgency is not terrorism, it is a political guerrilla war. Unfortunately, our national security state refused to countenance political negotiations with the Baloch insurgents innumerable times, resulting in the insurgency tipping over into the demand for independence. This is not a good portent for Pakistan. Sympathies or otherwise with the Baloch cause and its long standing grievances notwithstanding, the national security state has managed a self-fulfilling prophecy by relying on force alone (including disappearing thousands of people belonging to the troubled province). The Baloch insurgents may not be in a position to win against the powerful Pakistan armed forces in the foreseeable future, but the canker that is Balochistan will continue to suppurate and may even burst at some unexpected and unforeseeable turn of events.

Jamiat-i-Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman and his fellow madrassa boards maulvis seem to have got their way through a compromise on the registration issue that has been in the news for some time. The five older seminary boards and the new (10?) ones have now been allowed to choose who to be registered with, the Directorate General of Religious Education (DGRE) or the relevant deputy commissioner’s office. Everybody is therefore happy. But the niggling question remains: is the state and its institutions now in a position to ensure religious extremism does not form part of any madrassa’s curriculum? That is the central concern. Only time will tell if we have gone past this particular post.

Kurram Agency’s land and sectarian disputes continue, often violently, with road blockages that have starved the people of the Agency of badly needed food, medicine and warmth in the middle of a crackingly cold winter. Sympathetic sit-ins in support of the people of Kurram, particularly Parachinar, are being held all over the country. In Karachi, they have disrupted the traffic of the metropolis to the point where the Sindh Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) government and citizens are now crying themselves hoarse that the protests should, in all fairness, be held in KP, not Sindh. There are signs of a breakthrough in the jirgas confabulations for a solution to this complicated conflict, but better not to hold your breath on this one.

The ruling coalition too is showing signs of strain, if the PPP’s plethora of complaints of not being taken on board and involved in the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N’s) decision making are to be believed. The proposal of taking out six new canals from the already depleted waters of the Indus has roused the ire of all shades of opinion in Sindh, which sees this as a life-and death issue. South of Kotri, the Indus bed is a dry, sandy stretch used by children for playing cricket at least 10 months of the year. Any new canals threaten to turn Sindh into a desert unable to sustain its agriculture and other economic activities. The federation is once more under strain as a result.

Last but not least, the cheery news is that having arm-twisted the Independent Power Producers (IPPs) into either accepting a termination of contract or a radical reduction in tariffs (and profits) on a take and pay basis, the military establishment intends to extend its economic muscle into corporate agriculture (in Sindh and Punjab) and any other field in which Military Inc. is not already heavily invested. Of course all this is bound to boost the confidence of local and foreign investors. Only, again, don’t hold your breath (even if the AQI demands it).

Happy New Year?

 

 

 

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Monday, December 30, 2024

Filmbar's screening of Costa Gavraz's "Z" (1969) at RPC on Friday, January 3, 2025 at 5:00 pm sharp

Filmbar's screening of Costa-Gavras' "Z" (1969) at the Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, January 3, 2025, at 5:00 pm sharp.

In Greece, the public murder of a prominent politician and doctor amid a violent demonstration is covered up by military and government officials. A tenacious magistrate is determined not to let them get away with it.

The screening will be followed by an informal discussion.

All friends are welcome. Tea will be served.

Address: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom).

Rashed Rahman
Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)
Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)

Z (1969).jpgZ (1969) 2.0.jpeg

Thursday, December 26, 2024

Filmbar screening of Alain Resnais' "Hiroshima, Mon Amour" (1959) at RPC on Friday, December 27, 2024 at 5:00 pm sharp

Filmbar screening of Alain Resnais’ "Hiroshima, Mon Amour" (1959) at the Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, December 27, 2024 at 5:00 pm sharp. 

A French actress filming an anti-war film in Hiroshima has an affair with a married Japanese architect as they share their differing perspectives on war. 

The screening will be followed by an informal discussion. 

All friends are welcome. Tea will be served.

Address: Research and Publication centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom).

Rashed Rahman
Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)
Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook) 

IMG_6892.jpegIMG_6891.jpegIMG_6893.jpeg

Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Business Recorder Column December 24, 2024

The road to hell…

 

Rashed Rahman

 

The government and the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf (PTI) have finally, after much toing and froing, come to an agreement to hold talks, with the Speaker National Assembly (NA) Ayaz Sadiq playing the role of conciliatory mediator. For both sides, the change appears more tactical than a sincere effort to bridge the yawning divide between their respective positions. For the government, it avoids the potential public perception that it is seeking revenge for the travails its members suffered at the hands of the PTI when it was in power. For the PTI, it may be considered the sobering conclusion that its hitherto militant stance has hit an immovable deadly (‘fire’) wall. The PTI has thus decided that it must try to use less militant tactics to stay alive while continuing to pursue its demands, first and foremost the release of Imran Khan, then the release of all its other members, and finally judicial commissions to examine the events of May 9, 2023 and November 26, 2024.

The backdrop appears to be the sentencing of 25 civilians by military courts (out of 105 cases referred for trial by military courts) to between two to 10 years imprisonment for involvement in the May 9, 2023 riots. While the Supreme Court (SC) had earlier ruled against these trials, a seven-member Constitutional Bench established after the 26th Constitutional Amendment later permitted them, but provided the saving grace of allowing appeals against the military courts’ judgements. More appears to be in the offing. Retired Lieutenant-General Faiz Hameed’s court martial is due any moment, which is likely to include his role in the May 9, 2023 riots. Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi’s conviction in the Al-Qadir Trust case is expected in January 2025. Given signs that the establishment indicated on November 26, 2024 in Islamabad that it had finally lost patience with the PTI’s adventurous, violent, disruptive policy and had taken the gloves off, the PTI seems to have retreated to a seemingly more peaceful, open-to-dialogue avatar. However, out of habit, it still cannot refrain from a threatening tone when asserting that if its demands are not met, it will launch its civil disobedience movement, starting with cutting off remittances from Pakistanis abroad, on which the country’s balance of payments is critically reliant. Not unexpectedly, at the time of writing these lines, the first meeting between the two warring sides, presided over by NA Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, has taken place, with no tangible result worth mentioning so far. It would come as no surprise, given the gulf between the positions of either side, if this were fated to be the outcome of these talks, i.e. fruitless.

Meanwhile Defence Minister Khwaja Asif, during his sojourn in London, has come out all guns blazing against Imran Khan and the PTI in an interview. The timing may be coincidental, but Khwaja Asif’s whaling into the latter helps explain why he, a senior leader of the incumbent Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), is not in the negotiating committee of the government. The redoubtable Khwaja has renewed allegations of financial corruption worth trillions of rupees against Imran Khan, arguing that he broke all records of corruption that has been a fact of national life for the last 75 (77?) years. He referred to the impending verdict in the Pounds 190 million Al-Qadir Trust case and argued that the claims of PTI supporters that the money went into the SC’s account is untrue. Instead, he continued, it went into Malik Riaz of Bahria Town fame’s account. Imran, Khwaja Asif asserted, ‘obliged’ Malik Riaz in return for 400 acres of land and a position for Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi on the board of the Al-Qadir Trust University. Whether Khwaja Asif’s assertions are true or not, the smell of rotten fish in this instance is hard to ignore. Khwaja Asif blames the judiciary for the delay in punishing the May 9, 2023 rioters (hence the recourse to military courts, courtesy the Constitutional Bench?). Last but not least, the fiery Khwaja concludes that now there will be no repeat of the May 9, 2023 riots, even if Imran Khan is sentenced in one or more of the cases against him. Ironically though, Khwaja Asif lays the accusation at Imran Khan’s door that he was a product of the establishment, which casts one’s mind back to the origins of the PML-N. In this hamaam, not many are clothed I am afraid.

While these developments have our attention, it is not without importance that international and Pakistani human rights organisations have condemned the military trials as unfair, unjust, violating the accused’s inherent right to an open, transparent, law-adhering process. But even more ominous, the European Union (EU) has expressed concern over the sentencing of the 25 civilians by a military court, stating that these verdicts are inconsistent with Pakistan’s undertaken obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 14 of ICCPR lays down that every person is entitled to a fair and public trial in a court that is independent, impartial and competent, and has the right to adequate and effective legal representation. Violation of Pakistan’s commitments in this regard, the EU argues, could threaten Pakistan’s continuing to profit from the GSP+ that provides zero duties on Pakistani exports for 66 percent of tariff lines. This could imply the loss of EUR 5.4 billion (Rs 1.2 trillion) exports from Pakistan to the EU.

The road to hell is often paved with ‘good’ intentions.

 

 

 

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Monday, December 23, 2024

Book launch at RPC of Dr Asir Ajmal's "A Night in Managua and Other Stories" on Saturday, December 28, 2024 at 4:00 pm sharp

The Research and Publication Centre (RPC) announces the Book Launch of Dr Asir Ajmal's collection of short stories titled "A Night in Managua and Other Stories" on Saturday, December 28, 2024 at 4:00 pm sharp.

Dr Asir Ajmal is an academic, psychologist, poet and storyteller. In this collection of short stories and flash fiction, he explores love, fear, guilt and redemption from the streets of Managua to the heart of Heidelberg.

All friends are welcome. Tea will be served.

Address: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom).

Rashed Rahman

Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)

Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)


Thursday, December 19, 2024

Filmbar screening of Wong Car-wai's "In the Mood for Love" (2000) at RPC on Friday, December 20, 2024 at 5:00 pm sharp

Filmbar is screening Wong Kar-wai’s "In The Mood For Love" (2000) at the Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, December 20, 2024 at 5:00 pm sharp. 

Two neighbors form a strong bond after both suspect extramarital activities of their spouses. However, they agree to keep their bond platonic so as to not commit similar wrongs. 
 
The screening will be followed by an informal discussion. All friends are welcome. Tea will be served.

Address: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom).
Cells: 0302 8482737 & 0333 4216335.

Rashed Rahman
Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)
Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)

IMG_6851.jpegIMG_6855.jpegIMG_6854.jpeg

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

The Life and Legacy of Professor Eric Cyprian: A Talk by Raza Naeem at RPC on Saturday, December 21, 2024 at 4:00 pm sharp

The Research and Publication Centre (RPC) is holding a talk by Raza Naeem on the life and legacy of our late comrade Professor Eric Cyprian, a distinguished teacher of English literature and a son of the soil who was educated at the University of Oxford and then returning to Pakistan settled in Lahore and joined the Communist Party and had a distinguished academic career at the Forman Christian College and Islamia College in Lahore.

Moreover he was a comrade of Faiz Ahmad Faiz who was arrested multiple times for his support of the workers and peasant rights in Pakistan.

The talk will be followed by an open discussion. All friends are welcome. Tea will be served.

Address: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom).

Rashed Rahman
Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)
Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)
Cells: 0302 8482737 & 0333 4216335 

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Business Recorder Column December 17, 2024

APS and after

 

Rashed Rahman

 

For a parent, the loss of a child remains a searing wound that just will not heal. And when a parent is one of many whose progeny’s lives were snuffed out as innocent victims of a lunatic terrorist attack, the wound suppurates into anger, unremitting grief, and remembrance of those gone through the artefacts of their young school lives. Such is the collective fate of the parents of the 132 school children massacred brutally by Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP) terrorists in the Army Public School (APS), Peshawar, 10 years ago on December 16, 2014. They cannot stop crying whenever their lost children’s fate comes up. Fifteen others, amongst them brave teachers who sacrificed themselves while trying to protect their students from those mad, bloodthirsty murderers, were amongst the casualties. Some managed to survive with severe injuries. What was the fault of all these innocent souls? What had they done to deserve such a fate? Merely asking these questions wrenches every heart that is not a cold stone.

The country as a whole was traumatised by this atrocity. The civilian and military leadership came together eight days after the bloodshed to forge a consensus on terrorism and how to combat it. Even Imran Khan was forced to disperse his months-long sit-in at D-Chowk and join the national deliberations (however reluctantly was shown in later years). It boggles the mind therefore that Imran Khan had the gall to ‘rehabilitate’ and even invite the TTP in exile in Afghanistan to return to the country when he was in power, in exchange for laying down their weapons, which they practiced only in the breach. But before we reflect on this anomaly, we must retrace our steps to the military Operation Zarb-e-Azb, launched in June 2014 to knock out the terrorist sanctuaries in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s (KP’s) tribal areas.

The operation’s strategy was fatally flawed. It attacked the concentrations of TTP and other religious fundamentalist terrorists in KP’s tribal areas, particularly the Tirah Valley, without taking on board the critical task of cutting off their escape routes into Afghanistan. The result was that the TTP, when it could no longer bear the weight of the military’s unleashed firepower, retreated across the border into Afghanistan, finding safe haven in the poorly policed border regions in that country at war with the occupying US and western forces. When retreating, the TTP made sure to leave behind sleeper cells for when the battle could be resumed. At the time, my perception was summed up in what I wrote: The military has exported the problem, not scotched the snake. This implied the continuing threat of a revival of the terrorist movement inside Pakistan as and when the circumstances changed.

And change they did, especially after the Afghan Taliban’s victory in 2021. Sure enough, almost immediately after, and continuing at an accelerating pace today, the TTP have revived their campaign of terror, with almost by now daily attacks and their concomitant casualties and damage. One more hopeless effort as part of the National Action Plan (NAP) agreed by all stakeholders in 2014 was the creation of the National Counter-Terrorism Authority (NACTA), meant to coordinate intelligence gathering and analysis across the civilian-military divide. However, as anyone even remotely familiar with intelligence agencies’ operations could have pointed out, NACTA would inevitably run aground on the reluctance of intelligence agencies to share their information, even to fellow military or civilian agencies. That too has come to pass, and after floundering around in the dark for many years, NACTA is dead in the water.

To pay homage to the innocent victims of the APS tragedy, we as a people must unite behind the anti-terrorist struggle. But this is only possible if the intelligence agencies mobilise the citizenry to contribute to the effort to extinguish the terrorist threat born out of our misguided policies of supporting religious fundamentalist militancy in Afghanistan, which later turned on us in the deadly form of our very own Taliban. General Ziaul Haq’s religious zealotry failed to provide any good. It left a legacy of religious extremism that still grips large parts of our society and polity, and its Afghan avatar has come back to haunt us. Given the well-established proclivities of the intelligence services, not to mention the apex military establishment, this sounds like a forlorn hope, if not pie-in-the-sky. Nevertheless the fact remains that without a comprehensive mobilisation of the people and state institutions against the terrorist menace, Pakistan faces the lingering fallout of the APS massacre and after.

 

 

 

 

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Friday, December 13, 2024

Book Launch at RPC on December 14, 2024

The Research and Publication Centre (RPC) is holding a book launch of Saulat Nagi's "God's Republics: Making and Unmaking of Israel and Pakistan: The Ironic Parallels" on Saturday, December 14, 2024 at 4:00 pm. 

All friends are welcome. Tea will be served.

Address: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom).

Rashed Rahman

Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)

Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)

Cells: 0302 8482737 & 0333 4216335.

Tuesday, December 10, 2024

Business Recorder Column December 10, 2024

Bashar al-Assad’s fall

 

Rashed Rahman

 

The fall of Damascus the Syrian capital came on December 8, 2024 as the climax to the fall of city after city to the lightning offensive launched on November 27 by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) Islamic fundamentalist group led by Abu Mohammed al-Golani, who has emerged as the putative leader of Syria in the new obtaining circumstances. Bashar al-Assad, the deposed president, has fled with his family to Moscow and been granted asylum by the government, Russia having been, along with Iran, one of al-Assad’s main bastions of support since the 2011 protest movement morphed into a bloody civil war. As often happens after such cataclysmic events, there have been reports of widespread looting, including al Assad’s home. The Iranian embassy in Damascus has been ransacked. Al-Golani has since issued orders to his forces to maintain order and not harass people or enter their homes. This is of a piece with his stance of projecting himself as representing all the Syrian people, thereby allaying fears of HTS enforcing strict Sunni sharia law. It is also a reflection of how HTS, hitherto called the Nusra Front, an al Qaeda ally, has transformed itself into the leading force of a broad coalition of anti-Assad fundamentalist groups. It is this unity of the fundamentalist opposition that has paved the way for HTS’ incredible victory.

That victory was also made possible by the hollowing out by corruption and lack of commitment of the Syrian army after Russia, Iran and the Lebanese Hezbollah helped al-Assad prevail over the armed revolt against his regime. The hiatus that emerged from 2016 onwards in Syria’s civil war was not taken advantage of by the al-Assad regime to consolidate itself politically, the deprivations of forbidding sanctions imposed on it by the US-led west notwithstanding. Instead, in a demonstration of hubris, he continued to rely on the repressive measures that had become the hallmark of his rule. With his military disintegrating and the people fed up of his repressive rule with nothing positive to balance it, al-Assad became the ripe fruit for plucking once the Russian (because of the Ukraine war), Iranian and Hezbollah (owed to the Gaza and Lebanon-Israel wars) support had been weakened. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has boasted that it is the blows his country delivered on Hezbollah and Iran that made the downfall of al-Assad possible. Israel, in its inevitably alert exploitation of every opportunity, carried out air strikes on strategic sites and weapons depots in Damascus and south-west Syria after the fall of Assad. It has also deployed further troops in the Golan Heights, ostensibly to ‘protect’ the UN peacekeepers stationed there between Israeli-held territory (which it captured in the 1967 war and has since unilaterally annexed) but more probably with a view to taking advantage of the opportunity to annex more territory. Not to be left behind, the US, through CENTCOM, carried out 75 air strikes in central Syria, ostensibly against Islamic State (IS) assets.

While these startling developments since November 27, 2024, when HTS began its lightning offensive, represent a major strategic gain for the US, Israel and Turkiye and a major setback for Russia and Iran, its true import lies in the ‘completion’ of the task the US-led west (and Israel) set itself some years ago. This consisted of a concerted effort to weaken if not demolish the Axis of Resistance to Israel that emerged as the counter to the betrayal by successive Arab regimes (led first and foremost by Egypt) of recognising Israel and making peace with it. Three left-leaning Arab Nationalist (therefore anti-Israel, anti-imperialist) regimes became the foremost ‘take out’ targets. These were, Libya, Iraq and Syria. The first of these yielded the brutal death of Gaddafi and the subsequent civil war that continues to debilitate that country. The second, after two invasions, led to the hanging of Saddam Hussein and the subsequent state of civil war and destruction of that unfortunate country that has yet to completely subside. The third was Syria, besieged by a mass protest movement that emerged as part of the Arab Spring in 2011 but soon transmogrified into another bloody civil war, whose end we have now witnessed in the overthrow of Assad. Whatever one may think of Assad and his regime, there is some comfort in the fact that he and his family managed to flee safely to asylum in Moscow and did not suffer the fate of Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. The three ‘hold-out’ Arab regimes having now been demolished, can one begin to sing the funeral dirge of left-leaning, anti-imperialist, anti-Israel Arab regimes?

The intriguing part of this mosaic is how after spending five years in a US prison in Iraq for fighting with al Qaeda, al-Golani ended up over time as nothing short of a US and Israeli satrap. That is a story still to be told. The last word on Syria, however, still remains out there in the void. It will depend very much on what sort of regime emerges from HTS’s victory, what policies it adopts, how it governs. In other words, will the placatory stance adopted by al-Golani continue or will it be overtaken in time by the deeply fundamentalist hue the HTS (and even more its previous avatar Nusra Front) have camouflaged for the moment in ‘reconciliatory’ rhetoric?

 

 

 

 

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Monday, December 9, 2024

Filmbar screening of Mike Nichols' "Whose Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" at the Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, December 13, 2024, 5:00 pm sharp

Filmbar screening of Mike Nichols'  "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" at the Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, December 13, 2024 at 5:00 pm sharp.

A middle-aged New England associate professor and his wife, with the help of alcohol, use their young guests to fuel anguish and emotional pain towards each other over the course of a distressing night.

All friends are welcome. Tea will be served.

Rashed Rahman
Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)
Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook) 

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf_.jpgWho's Afraid of Virginia Woolf___.jpg

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Filmbar showing Jago Hua Savera at Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, December 6, 2024 at 5:00 pm sharp

Filmbar is showing A J Kardar's "Jago Hua Savera" at Research and Publication Centre (RPC) on Friday, December 6, 2024 at 5;00 pm sharp.

The film is based on the daily lives of the fishermen of East Bengal and their struggle with loan sharks.

Co-written by the legendary poet, Faiz Ahmad Faiz, this movie is a must-watch.

Address: Research and Publication Centre (RPC), 2nd Floor, 65 Main Boulevard Gulberg, Lahore (next to Standard Chartered Bank, above Indesign showroom).

All friends are welcome. Tea will be served.

Rashed Rahman
Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)
Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)
Cells: 0302 8482737 & 0333 4216335.

jaga hua sawera 2.jpgjaga hua sawera.png 

Monday, December 2, 2024

The December 2024 issue of Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) is out

The December 2024 issue of Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) is out. Link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com

Contents:

1. Tisaranee Gunasekara: An Inflection Point in Sri Lanka.
2. W B Bland: The Pakistani Revolution – V: The Economic pattern.
3. Fayyaz Baqir: My life and struggle – X: North America.
4. Imtiaz Alam: Rejoinder to Fayyaz Baqir.
5. Saleem Akhtar Malik: Jammu and Kashmir: The Pakistan Factor.
6. Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur: The Rise of Baloch Nationalism and Resistance – XVI: Human Development Index and Balochistan.
7. Samia Dogar: Lost generation.
8. From the PMR Archives:June 2019: From the Editor: Crisis of Pakistan’s state and society.

Rashed Rahman

Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)

Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)