Tuesday, April 19, 2022

Business Recorder Column April 19, 2022

What a fall

 

Rashed Rahman

 

The last two weeks in Pakistan’s life have shaken the country to its roots. As far as the Imran Khan-led Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf (PTI) coalition government is concerned, what a fall my countrymen.

Imran Khan decided to enter politics in 1996 after successfully leading Pakistan to its lone World Cup victory in 1992 and setting up the country’s first cancer hospital thereafter. Handsome, physically very fit, Imran Khan carried the aura not only of a cricketing hero but also a much admired philanthropist, a place he had arrived at after leaving his reputed playboy youth behind and being recast as a born-again Muslim. However, informed observers are aware that his political mentors who guided and pushed him into politics, former ISI chief Hamid Gul and the Jamaat-i-Islami, failed to educate him sufficiently in politics generally and Pakistan’s needs in particular. In fact, Imran Khan did not have a clue in 1996 what he hoped to achieve in politics (apart from coming to power by hook or by crook), failing to enunciate what his PTI’s manifesto or programme entailed in terms of state and society.

Critical and progressive minds refused to countenance having anything to do with such a clueless ‘leader’, with the exception of Mairaj Mohammad Khan who became the PTI’s first secretary general but did not last long in the toxic political culture of the party and its adherents. Soon after, Imran Khan was bitterly disappointed at military dictator General Pervez Musharraf’s fobbing him off with a sole seat in Mianwali in the 2002 elections, instead of being made Prime Minister (PM), which Imran Khan’s notorious ego felt was his natural right. At first Imran Khan revealed this bitterness and cursed himself for supporting General Musharraf amongst private circles while Musharraf was still in power. It is only when Musharraf became history that Imran Khan appeared on television to apologise for his ‘indiscretion’.

From 1996 to 2011, while the country was convulsed by Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, General Musharraf’s confrontation with the judiciary and his ultimate ouster, and the election of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) under Asif Ali Zardari, which elected government gave way to the next for the first time in Pakistan’s history through the ballot box, the PTI floundered. Its sudden uptick in 2011 is by now acknowledged to owe a great deal to former ISI chief General Pasha’s tutelage and support. The party’s support base, as evidenced in its initial big public rally at the Minar-i-Pakistan, Lahore, in 2011, consisted largely of the urban middle class, a relatively recent entrant into the country’s politics. This support base, both on the basis of its own culture as well as the messaging from the PTI leadership, reproduced the mind boggling level of entitlement, ego, arrogance and sheer hubris that eventually proved fatal for the PTI’s political fortunes after being graced into office through the support and help of the military establishment through the less than credible, if not rigged, 2018 general elections.

But the military establishment had imbibed the lesson of creating, coaching and bringing to power (thrice) of Nawaz Sharif, an experiment that from GHQ’s point of view went badly wrong. The schema therefore was to bring Imran Khan and the PTI close to a majority but leave it dangling there. That meant small weathercock parties under the influence if not control of the military establishment such as the Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid) (PML-Q) and the Muttahidda Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) were inducted as part of the PTI coalition government. The scene was thus primed for pulling the rug from under PTI’s slim majority of five should Imran Khan too prove less than amenable.

And boy, did he. At a time in 2021 when it seemed nothing, the Covid nightmare, economic difficulties, even the lacking in credibility anti-corruption drive could unseat Imran Khan, in his own inimitable style, he shot himself in the foot. The ‘conflict’ around the appointment of the new ISI chief pitched Imran Khan’s desire to retain Lieutenant General Faiz Hameed in the position against the institutional working of the military. Although Lieutenant General Faiz Hameed was eventually posted out as Corps Commander Peshawar, the bad blood between the military and Imran Khan over this ‘interference’ in military affairs left an indelible mark. The military establishment, worried by the non-performance or bad performance of the PTI government seems finally to have decided enough is enough. They declared ‘neutrality’, although such a posture in the confrontational scenario of the PTI government versus the backs to the wall (thank you National Accountability Bureau, amongst others) opposition, meant the end of the PTI government was nigh.

Had Imran khan had even a modicum of political sense, he would have bowed out gracefully when the writing was clearly on the wall, sat in the opposition, and lived to fight another day. Instead, we were treated to the ignominious shenanigans and hanky-panky in the National Assembly (NA) over the no-confidence motion, as well as the egregious violence in the Punjab Assembly (PA) later. On the former, unconfirmed reports speak of the military establishment finally putting its foot down, while the Supreme Court intervened to reverse the unconstitutional course adopted by the PTI in the NA. A similar judicial intervention (although not suo motu) might follow in the case of the PA dreadful happenings.

Imran Khan has taken to the streets after all his members of parliament have either resigned or are in the process of doing so. Whether one has any sympathy for Imran Khan or not, it seems foolish to give up the parliamentary platform as an additional theatre of struggle. If Imran Khan thinks he can overcome through street power, he should think again. No doubt the PTI rallies are impressive, a result not only of the core support of the PTI being intact, but almost four years in power arguably having expanded the support base, despite the economic hardships the people were subjected to.

In Pakistan’s history, should we break with our tradition to learn something from it, very few street power campaigns have succeeded, or at least not fully. At best they have led to change in governments, but the present concatenation of forces does not speak in favour of Imran Khan or the PTI. As it is, in time honoured fashion, the wheels of counter-accountability have started to churn with the Toshakhana scandal. Watch this space for more of the same, and much worse.

 

 

 

 

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Tuesday, April 12, 2022

Business Recorder Column April 12, 2022

Hope afresh

 

Rashed Rahman

 

The past week has been one of the most dramatic in Pakistan’s history. But even more remarkable is the fact that a sitting Prime Minister (PM) has been removed through a vote of no-confidence for the first time in our turbulent history and replaced by a democratic vote for an incoming PM. Imran Khan and his Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf (PTI) government lost the no-confidence vote by 174 to none, without even the PTI dissident MNAs having to cast their vote on April 10, 2022. On the following day, April 11, 2022, Shahbaz Sharif, the Leader of the Opposition and head of the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) (PML-N), was elected the PM with exactly the same number of votes, 174 to none.

On both occasions, the former ruling PTI absented itself from the National Assembly (NA). On April 11, 2022, when the house convened to carry through the election of a new PM through voting, the PTI again opted out of the session. Thus the opposition benches moved to the treasury benches in a smooth, democratic transition, so rare in our history.

Incoming PM (yet to take his oath of office at the time of writing these lines) Shahbaz Sharif delivered one of the most statesmanlike speeches ever heard by an elected Leader of the House. In his wide ranging address, he gave thanks that Pakistan had been saved from the potential conflict being engendered by the PTI through its unconstitutional manipulations to sabotage or prevent the vote of no-confidence against Imran Khan. The latter, not unexpectedly given his public persona and personality, instead of bowing out with grace, chose an ignominious exit.

Shahbaz Sharif’s address to the house reiterated the triumph of justice and the truth in the shape of the no-confidence vote whereby a selected PM was turfed out and with him, Imran Khan’s mountain of deceit, lies, half-truths and other shenanigans.

The Supreme Court (SC) was appreciated and congratulated by Shahbaz Sharif for its suo motu role in reversing the unconstitutional steps of Imran Khan, solely aimed at desperate last minute manoeuvres to save his sinking ship. He went on to assert (as have many others) that the doctrine of necessity that has distorted our jurisprudence for so long has finally been buried by the SC. One hopes so, but one sparrow does not a spring make. We hope the honourable SC and the judiciary as a whole will uphold this burial of the doctrine of necessity consistently in times to come.

Berating Imran Khan for waving a purported letter establishing a US-inspired conspiracy in cahoots with the combined opposition entire to bring about regime change, Shahbaz Sharif revealed that despite the outgoing government’s promise, the purported letter was neither shown to him nor is he aware of its contents. He revealed that the letter was a desperate attempt by Imran Khan to play the ‘patriotic card’ when the opposition had already been in consultations and after due deliberations, arrived at a consensus decision to move the motion of no-confidence. He promised an in-camera briefing in a parliamentary committee on the affair with the COAS and ISI chief present. He went on to assert that if even a shred of evidence was produced to substantiate Imran Khan’s wild charges of conspiracy and the opposition’s involvement, he would resign and go home.

Thanking the media and the lawyers’ community for their support for constitutional, democratic principles, Shahbaz Sharif briefly touched on the repression of and false cases against the opposition by Imran Khan. He ringingly declared that there are no traitors now or earlier, contrary to Imran Khan’s false and deceitful assertions. Even more importantly, Shahbaz Sharif stressed the need for national unity and dialogue, not confrontational deadlock, if the immense challenges left behind by the Imran Khan government were to be met, which could take years to cleanse the poison injected into the polity by Imran Khan and company. This unity and cooperation, Shahbaz Sharif stressed, was the only way the economic disaster bequeathed by Imran Khan could be overcome. To alleviate the sufferings of the people during Imran Khan’s almost four years in office, Shahbaz Sharif announced the minimum wage would be raised countrywide to Rs 25,000 a month, salaried workers earning below Rs 100,000 per month would receive a 10 percent increase as would civil and military pensioners. Perhaps because of his lengthy stint as Punjab Chief Minister (CM), Shahbaz Sharif underlined that the smaller provinces’ grievances and deprivations would be addressed to avoid any notion that only Punjab would prosper under the new government. In other words, he stressed inclusiveness in economic and social development.

Dilating on foreign policy, Shahbaz Sharif outlined how Imran Khan had weakened ties with old friends like China, Saudi Arabia, the region, the European Union, UK, and even, despite a history of ups and downs, our critical relationship with the US. He mentioned the current difficulties being faced by the long suffering people of Afghanistan, Kashmir and the Palestinians. He vowed to support the Kashmir cause on all forums and appealed to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to resolve the Kashmir issue according to the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the wishes of the people of Kashmir so that the poverty and deprivation of the peoples of Pakistan and India could be overcome.

Statesmanlike, with a healing touch, Shahbaz Sharif’s address to the NA provides hope afresh for Pakistan to tackle its internal and external problems, with the economy arguably occupying centre-stage. Of course the proof of the pudding is in the eating. But given the unprecedented unity of almost the entire opposition spectrum as was evident in the NA on April 11, 2022, the people of Pakistan have breathed a sigh of relief that they have seen the back of Imran Khan who visited such hardships on them, and rekindled their hope that a new, inclusive, broad based government composed of the combined opposition with Shahbaz Sharif at its head will translate ‘Punjab speed’, for which Shahbaz Sharif was famous as the province’s CM, into ‘Pakistan speed’, the term with which he ended his historic address as our new PM.

 

 

 

 

 

rashed-rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Business Recorder Column April 5, 2022

Imran Khan’s ‘flight’

 

Rashed Rahman

 

Politics in Pakistan never fails to surprise and shock. But Imran Khan’s actions in the last few days have broken all records. Contrary to his defiant statements since the no-confidence motion was moved against him by the opposition to ‘fight till the last ball’, Imran Khan chose instead to take ‘flight’ when it had become obvious to even the purblind that he had lost his (precarious) majority in the National Assembly (NA). However, the manner in which this was done has created a constitutional crisis that the Supreme Court (SC) felt compelled to take suo motu notice of.

On April 3, 2022, the NA met to vote on the no-confidence motion. But instead of implementing this constitutional obligation, former (appointed just a day before) Law Minister Fawad Chaudhry argued on the floor of the house that the ‘foreign conspiracy’ to unseat Imran Khan and his Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf (PTI) government involved the active participation of the opposition, attracting thereby the provisions of Article 5 of the Constitution (enjoining loyalty to the state). Since NA Speaker Asad Qaiser was himself the target of a no-confidence motion, Deputy Speaker Qasim Suri ‘disallowed’ the no-confidence motion by taking refuge behind Article 5 and then abruptly prorogued the NA session. This blatantly unconstitutional and anti-democratic legerdemain at first left the opposition stunned, but they soon recovered to ‘continue’ the session with former NA speaker Ayaz Sadiq in the chair. This ‘session’ yielded 197 votes against Imran Khan, far more than the required 172.

Immediately after the manipulated rejection of the no-confidence motion and prorogation of the NA session, Imran Khan advised President Arif Alvi to dissolve the NA and announce fresh elections. The loyalist President duly obliged, but in the view of prescient legal and constitutional experts, violated the Constitution since the dismissal of the no-confidence motion was illegal and in any case a prime minister facing such a motion cannot advise the President to dissolve the NA. On April 4, 2022, a day after the dissolution of the NA, President Alvi wrote to (now) caretaker Prime Minister (PM) Imran Khan and (former) Leader of the Opposition Shahbaz Sharif to undertake consultations on names for the caretaker PM. This was roundly rejected by the opposition on the grounds of the unconstitutional handling of the no-confidence issue as well as by pointing out that after the (illegal) dissolution of the NA, there was no such person as the Leader of the Opposition any more. In the absence of such consultations, the names proposed by the two sides of the political divide are to be taken up by a parliamentary committee composed of eight members from each side. If, as is likely, the opposition is consistent in rejecting this too since it flows again from the unconstitutional dismissal of the no-confidence motion and the immediately following dissolution of the NA, the impasse threatens the whole structure for its inability to then move the process forward towards fresh elections.

As has been the trend in our politics for the last two decades, the issue inevitably has landed up with the judiciary. The Supreme Court (SC) took suo motu notice of the affair and, in an extraordinary sitting on Sunday, April 3, 2022, advised all institutions of the state not to indulge in any unconstitutional acts, while binding any further decisions of the President and (interim) PM to the orders of the court. The hearing was continuing at the time of writing these lines, so it would not be appropriate to speculate what the outcome may be.

Meanwhile the army, through ISPR, has distanced itself from the whole brouhaha. Interestingly, while Imran Khan has attempted to build his whole ‘conspiracy’ case around the US allegedly working for ‘regime change’ in Pakistan, COAS General Qamar Jawed Bajwa in an address to a national security moot the other day attempted to soothe ruffled feathers in Washington, not the least by critiquing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and reiterating Pakistan’s desire not to be part of any bloc. Underlying this attempt at damage control lie both military and economic considerations. Despite our close ties with China, the military top brass does not want its long standing ties with the US, particularly the Pentagon, weakened, despite Washington’s muted expression of annoyance with Islamabad for the US’s Afghanistan debacle. Instead of being sensitive to our unfortunate dependence on the US-led west and the international lending institutions under its control, Imran Khan could do no better than flog the ‘patriotic card’ once things began to slip out of his grasp. It should not be forgotten that we have been unable to close the deal with the IMF (which produces new terms and conditions after every meeting) nor escaped the unwelcome attentions of the FATF. As predicted in this space after last year’s ignominious US retreat from Afghanistan and the Taliban takeover, empires have long memories and are unforgiving. The easiest and most camouflagable method to punish Pakistan was always going to be through denying it the financial/economic support from the IMF (which opens the doors to other international lenders and the market) and putting it on notice through the FATF. This is in progress as we speak, rendering Imran Khan’s ‘adventurism’ against the US-led west ill timed, to put it mildly.

The uncertainty that has gripped the country because of the patently illegal, anti-democratic and unconstitutional manipulations of the past few days by Imran Khan and the PTI have raised alarm and concern within the country. How it will finally play out is difficult to predict. Optimists are looking to the SC to find a constitutional, democratic solution since the political class has been so divided and polarised by Imran Khan and company that not much in the way of positive good sense can be expected to flow from that direction.

 

 

 

 

rashed.rahman1@gmail.com

rashed-rahman.blogspot.com

Monday, April 4, 2022

The April 2022 issue of Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) is out

The April 2022 issue of Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) is out. Link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com

Contents:

1. Vijay Prashad: The life of a great Marxist: Aijaz Ahmad.

2. Justin Podur: How Pakistan can find a Development-First path to peace in Balochistan.

3. Prof Yunas Samad: Book Review of Dr Ahsan Butt: Secession and Security: Explaining State Strategy against Separatists.

Rashed Rahman

Editor, Pakistan Monthly Review (PMR) (link: pakistanmonthlyreview.com)

Director, Research and Publication Centre (RPC) (on Facebook)